Last month Blank gave false information to at least 2 HPD officers, and posted about it in numerous online sites.
Miriam Blank - False Police Report Charging Instrument
Sunday, January 12, 2014
MIRIAM BLANK FACES CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR FILING FALSE INFORMATION WITHPOLICE
Miriam Blank will once again face charges in the Harris County Criminal courts.
Last month Blank gave false information to at least 2 HPD officers, and posted about it in numerous online sites.
Miriam Blank - False Police Report Charging Instrument
Last month Blank gave false information to at least 2 HPD officers, and posted about it in numerous online sites.
Miriam Blank - False Police Report Charging Instrument
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. MIRIAM BLANK
ReplyDeleteMISDEMEANOR CHARGE: False Report to Peace Officer, Investigator, or Employee
HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT AT LAW NO: 2
IN THE NAME AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
Before me, the undersigned Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Texas this day appeared the undersigned affiant, who under oath says that he has good reason to believe and does believe that in Harris County, Texas, MIRIAM BLANK, hereafter styled the defendant, heretofore on or about December 20, 2013, did then and there unlawfully with intent to deceive, knowingly make a false statement, namely, the Defendant said THAT HER DAUGHTER, HANNAH NUSZEN, WAS A MISSING PERSON to D. RIOJAS, a peace officer with HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT conducting an investigation OF A MISSING PERSON REPORT, and the Defendant’s statement was material to that investigation.
PROBABLE CAUSE
AFFIANT, G. YOUNG, A CREDIBLE AND RELIABLE PERSON EMPLOYED AS A PEACE OFFICER WITH THE HARRIS COUNTY PRECINCT 7 CONSTABLE’S OFFICE, BELIEVES AND HAS REASON TO BELIEVE THAT MIRIAM BLANK, DOB 12-9-1969, HEREAFTER STYLED THE DEFENDANT, COMMITTED THE OFFENSE OF FALSE REPORT TO A PEACE OFFICER ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 20, 2013. AFFIANT’S BELIEFS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FACTS:
AFFIANT SPOKE TO D. R. RIOJAS, A CREDIBLE AND RELIABLE PERSON EMPLOYED BY THE HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT AS A PATROL OFFICER. OFFICER RIOJAS TOLD ME THAT ON DECEMBER 20, 2013 HE WAS DISPATCHED TO 7503 MOONDANCE, HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REGARDING A MISSING PERSON REPORT. OFFICER RIOJAS STATED THAT HE MET DEFENDANT AT THAT TIME AND RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM HER THAT A MINOR CHILD OF HERS AND HER EX-HUSBAND, JACK NUSZEN, 15 YEAR-OLD HANNAH NUSZEN, HAD BEEN MISSING SINCE DECEMBER 16, 2013. OFFICER RIOJAS ALSO RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM DEFENDANT REGARDING AN INTERFERENCE WITH CHILD CUSTODY ALLEGATION SHE MADE AGAINST JACK NUSZEN AND GAVE OFFICER RIOJAS THE REPORT NUMBER FOR THAT INCIDENT (#157737713).
AFFIANT READ INDICENT REPORT 157737713 AND FOUND THE ORIGINAL REPORT TO HAVE BEEN AUTHORED BY OFFICER W.A. LINARES OF THE HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT. THEREIN, OFFICER LINARES EXPLAINS THAT ON DECEMBER 19, 2013, HE MET THE DEFENDANT (REFFERED TO AS MIRIAM NUSZEN IN HIS REPORT) AT 7503 MOONDANCE, HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REGARDING AN INTERFERENCE WITH CHILD CUSTODY ALLEGATION SHE WAS MAKING AGAINST JACK NUSZEN. OFFICER LINARES ALSO WROTE THAT DEFENDANT DISCOVERED ON DECEMBER 16, 2013 THAT JACK NUSZEN PICKED UP HANNAH NUSZEN FROM SCHOOL AT 2:00 P.M. THAT DAY AND THEN HAD TAKEN HER TO A HOSPITAL IN UTAH.
AFFIANT SPOKE TO JACK NUSZEN AND LEARNED THAT HE HAD COLLECTED A NUMBER OF FLIERS, BOTH PRINTED OUT AND DISTRIBUTED IN THE AREA IN WHICH HE AND THE DEFENDANT LIVE AS WELL AS THOSE MAINTAINED ON-LINE WHEREIN IT IS ALLEGED THAT HANNAH NUSZEN IS A MISSING PERSON. JACK NUSZEN GAVE COPIES OF THESE FLIERS TO AFFIANT, AS WELL AS AN EMAIL HE HAD SENT TO THE DEFENDANT ON DECEMBER 18, 2013, EXPLAINING THAT HANNAH NUSZEN WAS IN A TREATMENT FACILITY.
AFFIANT FOUND COURT RECORDS FOR CAUSE NUMBER 2008-54154 IN THE 246TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS AND LEARNED THAT ON NOVEMBER 20, 2013, PRIMARY CUSTODY OF ALL CHILDREN OF DEFENDANT AND JACK NUSZEN WAS BEING AWARDED TO JACK NUSZEN, INCLUDING HANNAH NUSZEN FOLLOWING A JURY VERDICT. AFFIANT ALSO OBSERVED THAT DEFENDANT WAS ORDERED TO PAY BACK CHILD SUPPORT AND HAD AN ORDER GARNISHING WAGES, ADDITIONALLY, AFFIANT OBSERVED THAT DEFENDANT WAS APPEALING THIS VERDICT AND ON DECEMBER 16, 2013, COURT ACTIVITY WITH SUBPOENAS TO MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS (FOR EXAMINING THE CHILDREN FROM THE MARRIAGE) WAS FILED WITH THE DISTRICT CLERK’S OFFICE.
BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS AFFIANT’S BELIEF THAT DEFENDANT KNEW FULL-WELL WHERE HANNAH NUSZEN WAS WHEN SHE REPORTED HER MISSING TO OFFICER RIOJAS ON DECEMBER 20, 2013 AS DESCRIBED ABOVE.
Sworn to and subscribed before me on December 29, 2013
Probable Cause found DEC 30, 2013