- Dad wins sole custody via jury trial in October 2013 - Click here for documentation
- Dad makes attempts to transfer custody, Mother refuses to help and tells him to get them from school (was this a set up from the beginning?) - Click here to see email
- Dad manages to pick up only one girl from school - See letter to Harmony school
- Dad follows through with recommendation of forensic psychologist (which was main subject throughout the 3 week trial) - Click here to see recommendation of Dr. Karen Gollagher
- Dad notifies mom that Hannah is safe, and being treated - Click here to see email
- Dad notifies police of false missing persons report - Verified as closed by Officer Riojas on 12/20/13, and again on 12/28/13
Mom needs to make up her mind:
- Do you know where the child is? Multiple sites still claim Hannah is missing, and that she has no idea where she is. The facility however reports harassment by the mother, as well as threats to a local Rabbi (chaplain) who has not even been in contact with Hannah. Miriam Blank's sister announced via facebook that Hannah had been found, and was in Utah. She later removed that comment and told people it's not true, we still don't know where she is (after Blank told her "Shhh! Don't tell! I'm going with the kidnap lie!"?)
- Mom admits in her plea for funding that she was notified of Hannah's treatment, and is already claiming abuse and mistreatment by the institution - click here to see funding plea
- Yet mom continues making false police reports regarding a missing child, as well as abuse complaints to CPS. Both police & CPS have verified Hannah's safety, and closed their case.
Making false allegations, false police & CPS reports, and creating white house petitions to get back custody is nothing more than trying to bully the system.
Judge York has a history of being pro-mom, and allowing the children to remain in the mother's care even with knowledge of abuse. If the dad now has sole custody of 5 girls, the evidence in trial must have been overwhelming. Being a jury trial, Judge York would not have had a say so.
THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. MIRIAM BLANK
ReplyDeleteMISDEMEANOR CHARGE: False Report to Peace Officer, Investigator, or Employee
HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT AT LAW NO: 2
IN THE NAME AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
Before me, the undersigned Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Texas this day appeared the undersigned affiant, who under oath says that he has good reason to believe and does believe that in Harris County, Texas, MIRIAM BLANK, hereafter styled the defendant, heretofore on or about December 20, 2013, did then and there unlawfully with intent to deceive, knowingly make a false statement, namely, the Defendant said THAT HER DAUGHTER, HANNAH NUSZEN, WAS A MISSING PERSON to D. RIOJAS, a peace officer with HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT conducting an investigation OF A MISSING PERSON REPORT, and the Defendant’s statement was material to that investigation.
PROBABLE CAUSE
AFFIANT, G. YOUNG, A CREDIBLE AND RELIABLE PERSON EMPLOYED AS A PEACE OFFICER WITH THE HARRIS COUNTY PRECINCT 7 CONSTABLE’S OFFICE, BELIEVES AND HAS REASON TO BELIEVE THAT MIRIAM BLANK, DOB 12-9-1969, HEREAFTER STYLED THE DEFENDANT, COMMITTED THE OFFENSE OF FALSE REPORT TO A PEACE OFFICER ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 20, 2013. AFFIANT’S BELIEFS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FACTS:
AFFIANT SPOKE TO D. R. RIOJAS, A CREDIBLE AND RELIABLE PERSON EMPLOYED BY THE HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT AS A PATROL OFFICER. OFFICER RIOJAS TOLD ME THAT ON DECEMBER 20, 2013 HE WAS DISPATCHED TO 7503 MOONDANCE, HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REGARDING A MISSING PERSON REPORT. OFFICER RIOJAS STATED THAT HE MET DEFENDANT AT THAT TIME AND RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM HER THAT A MINOR CHILD OF HERS AND HER EX-HUSBAND, JACK NUSZEN, 15 YEAR-OLD HANNAH NUSZEN, HAD BEEN MISSING SINCE DECEMBER 16, 2013. OFFICER RIOJAS ALSO RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM DEFENDANT REGARDING AN INTERFERENCE WITH CHILD CUSTODY ALLEGATION SHE MADE AGAINST JACK NUSZEN AND GAVE OFFICER RIOJAS THE REPORT NUMBER FOR THAT INCIDENT (#157737713).
AFFIANT READ INDICENT REPORT 157737713 AND FOUND THE ORIGINAL REPORT TO HAVE BEEN AUTHORED BY OFFICER W.A. LINARES OF THE HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT. THEREIN, OFFICER LINARES EXPLAINS THAT ON DECEMBER 19, 2013, HE MET THE DEFENDANT (REFFERED TO AS MIRIAM NUSZEN IN HIS REPORT) AT 7503 MOONDANCE, HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REGARDING AN INTERFERENCE WITH CHILD CUSTODY ALLEGATION SHE WAS MAKING AGAINST JACK NUSZEN. OFFICER LINARES ALSO WROTE THAT DEFENDANT DISCOVERED ON DECEMBER 16, 2013 THAT JACK NUSZEN PICKED UP HANNAH NUSZEN FROM SCHOOL AT 2:00 P.M. THAT DAY AND THEN HAD TAKEN HER TO A HOSPITAL IN UTAH.
AFFIANT SPOKE TO JACK NUSZEN AND LEARNED THAT HE HAD COLLECTED A NUMBER OF FLIERS, BOTH PRINTED OUT AND DISTRIBUTED IN THE AREA IN WHICH HE AND THE DEFENDANT LIVE AS WELL AS THOSE MAINTAINED ON-LINE WHEREIN IT IS ALLEGED THAT HANNAH NUSZEN IS A MISSING PERSON. JACK NUSZEN GAVE COPIES OF THESE FLIERS TO AFFIANT, AS WELL AS AN EMAIL HE HAD SENT TO THE DEFENDANT ON DECEMBER 18, 2013, EXPLAINING THAT HANNAH NUSZEN WAS IN A TREATMENT FACILITY.
AFFIANT FOUND COURT RECORDS FOR CAUSE NUMBER 2008-54154 IN THE 246TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS AND LEARNED THAT ON NOVEMBER 20, 2013, PRIMARY CUSTODY OF ALL CHILDREN OF DEFENDANT AND JACK NUSZEN WAS BEING AWARDED TO JACK NUSZEN, INCLUDING HANNAH NUSZEN FOLLOWING A JURY VERDICT. AFFIANT ALSO OBSERVED THAT DEFENDANT WAS ORDERED TO PAY BACK CHILD SUPPORT AND HAD AN ORDER GARNISHING WAGES, ADDITIONALLY, AFFIANT OBSERVED THAT DEFENDANT WAS APPEALING THIS VERDICT AND ON DECEMBER 16, 2013, COURT ACTIVITY WITH SUBPOENAS TO MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS (FOR EXAMINING THE CHILDREN FROM THE MARRIAGE) WAS FILED WITH THE DISTRICT CLERK’S OFFICE.
BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS AFFIANT’S BELIEF THAT DEFENDANT KNEW FULL-WELL WHERE HANNAH NUSZEN WAS WHEN SHE REPORTED HER MISSING TO OFFICER RIOJAS ON DECEMBER 20, 2013 AS DESCRIBED ABOVE.
Sworn to and subscribed before me on December 29, 2013
Probable Cause found DEC 30, 2013